|
General exploratory or sweep searches are usually impermissible
under constitutional standards.
Accordingly,
school officials may inspect a student’s bag (purse, backpack,
duffel) and clothing for hidden weapons, cigarettes and drugs where
they have reason to do so (e.g., a tip that appears to be reliable,
observation of materials associated with drug use, bulges in clothing
characteristic of weapons). As additional examples, school officials
may search a student for weapons where they notice a bulge in a
student’s clothing characteristic of knives and the officials
received an anonymous tip that a student had a weapon. Security
officers may frisk a student and proceed on reasonable suspicion
resulting from the stop. Teachers and school officials should be
careful to document their preliminary observations, sources of information,
tips, investigative steps, or other evidence that leads to reasonable
grounds for a search.
Student
Tips
In
the case of student tips about illegal behavior, school officials
must take steps to verify the reliability of the information. They
may subject the student informant to extensive questioning regarding
the student’s motives, perception or source of knowledge.
In addition, they may conduct their own investigation of the accused
student’s activities through direct observations, questioning
classmates or using other methods, in an effort to corroborate the
tip.

|
Either
approach ensures school officials have reasonable grounds to believe
a search will produce contraband or evidence of illegal behavior.
Risk
Factors – “Profiles”
In
some circumstances, a list of risk factors for youth violence or
a “profile” of a potentially dangerous student may be
used as grounds to stop a student for questioning or to search his
or her possessions or person. There is no specific legal rule, such
as a Supreme Court
decision, addressing the use of risk factor lists or profiles in
the school setting. The general rules regarding passenger profiles
used in airports provide some directions for the use of a profile
in a school.
The
Supreme Court has expressly approved the use of “probabilistic”
profiles in the airport setting to identify potential drug couriers
or terrorists. Generally, individuals may be searched based on their
identification through the use of a profile because the profile
provides the officers with reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect.
Profiles are valid as long as they leave no room for subjective
interpretation and are not applied in a discriminatory fashion.
Based
on this background, a profile may be an acceptable method of identifying
students who may present a risk to the safety of a school and may
be stopped for additional questioning. The profile, however, should
not stand alone as the only factor justifying a search. School officials
might use a profile to stop students to inquire about their activities,
but probably need other suspicious behavior or other corroborating
information in order to conduct a full search of the student’s
person or property. A school official needs reasonable grounds for
suspecting a search will reveal contraband, or evidence that a student
is violating school
continued
on page 6
go to page four |